C
OMPLIANCE ADVISORYC
OLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTA
IR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION4300 C
HERRY CREEK DRIVE SOUTHD
ENVER, COLORADO 80246-1530T
ELEPHONE: 303-692-3150Contact Name: James A. Cain
Company Name: Cotter Corporation
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1750, Canon City, CO 81215-1750
Facility Name: Canon City Mill
Facility Location: 0502 County Rd 68, Canon City, CO
Date Sent: October 22, 2002
This Compliance Advisory provides notice related to information gained during the Air
Pollution Control Division
’s ("Division") inspection of the above named facility on the dateshown. We advise you that the inspector(s) believes that the Deficiencies listed below are
violations of the Colorado Air Pollution Prevention and Control Act and implementing
regulations. Division personnel will review the facts established during this inspection and
this notice may be revised to include additions or clarifications as a result of that review.
Please be aware that you are responsible for complying with the State air pollution
regulations and that there are substantial administrative and civil penalties for failing to do
so. Section 25-7-115, C.R.S., provides that any person who violates the Colorado Air
Pollution Prevention and Control Act ("the Act") may be subject to an administrative penalty
of not more than $15,000 per day of violation (violations of the requirements to have and to
comply with an operating permit may subject the violator to $15,000 per violation per day).
The issuance of this Compliance Advisory does not limit or preclude the Division from
pursuing its enforcement options concerning this inspection including issuance of a
Compliance Order and assessment of penalties. Also, this Compliance Advisory does not
constitute a bar to enforcement action for conditions that the inspector did not observe or
evaluate, or conditions found during future inspections of your facility.
To close out this Compliance Advisory, we encourage you to contact the Compliance Officer
listed below at the above address, and where necessary, schedule a meeting:
A. To discuss the Compliance Advisory and answer any questions you may have;
B. To develop a schedule for correcting the Deficiencies and Potential Deficiencies; or
C. To submit information necessary to successfully show that the Deficiencies and
Potential Deficiencies (or any portion of them) are not violations of Colorado
’s airpollution laws.
Scott K. Mason , Compliance Officer (Telephone Number 303-692-3253 )
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
MAIL NO. 7001 1140 0003 9657 3937
Failure to respond in a timely fashion to this Compliance Advisory will be considered in any
subsequent enforcement action and the assessment of penalties. The following is a list of
potential deficiencies:
1. Cotter is not tracking a rolling twelve-month total of criteria pollutants. Violation of
permit condition 13 which says in part…
"Compliance with the annual limits shall be determined on a rolling (12) month
total."
2. Cotter is not tracking monthly records of actual production. Violation of permit
condition 9 which says in part…
"Monthly records of the actual production rate shall be maintained by the
applicant and made available to the Division for inspection upon request."
3. Cotter has not demonstrated compliance within 180 days of commencement of
operation on several points. The reason Cotter has not completed this requirement
is a combination of the troubles encountered with starting a process that has never
been done before and the financial troubles with Cotter’s business partner. Cotter
cannot demonstrate compliance without the process operating. Because of these
troubles I recommend the Division not take an enforcement action on this specific
issue. However, a new date for demonstrating compliance should be established in
a Consent Decree.
4. Cotter removed the bags from the vanadium fusion furnace baghouse and continued
to operate the furnace without a permit modification. Violation of permit condition 9
which says in part…
"This facility’s throughput / consumption of materials shall be limited by the
emission limits specified in this permit, throughput / consumption of individual
equipment / activities as specified in Attachment A, and all other activities,
operational rates and numbers of equipment as stated in the application."
5. Cotter personnel documented a single six-minute Method 9 reading averaging
23.1%. Violation of permit condition 2 which says in part…
"Visible emissions shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) opacity during normal
operation of the source."
Please contact the Compliance Officer on page 1 of this Compliance Advisory within 10
days of receipt of the advisory to schedule a meeting to discuss the above compliance
issues.
Cc: Harry Collier, APCD
Cindy Reynolds, R8 EPA
Casey Shpall, AGO
Phil Egidi, RAD