|
CCAT continues monitoring the Cotter/Lincoln Park Superfund Site and current activities at the Cotter Uranium Mill
This website is maintained by CCAT volunteers as time permits |
|
Cotter Uranium Mill to Reopen in 2014
On March 31, 2009, the Cotter Corporation, an affiliate of General Atomics, announced plans to refurbish, rebuild and open their uranium mill at the southern edge of Canon City, CO. Click to read Cotter Reopening and Reaction news articles. The mill was built in 1958, with unlined mill tailings impoundments, resulting in extensive water and soil contamination. The mill and the surrounding neighborhood of Lincoln Park was declared a Superfund Site in 1984, and it is still a Superfund Site. The mill was dormant from 1985 until 1999, when reopened. Due to poor conditions and management of the facility, from 2000 to 2006 over $59,000 was paid in fines, and 90 violations were cited for:
Spills, injuries from acids and inhaling radioactive materials, inadequate employee dose exposure calculations, failure to use baghouse filters, improper hazardous waste storage, failure to report hazardous spill, exceeding air opacity emissions, exceeding solvent usage and Volatile Organic Chemical emission limits, inoperable safety showers and eye wash stations, failure to maintain proper documentation, inaccurate log and inspection reports, failure to sample Yellowcake stack emissions, inadequate Emergency Response Exercise and documentation, failure to investigate Personal Radiation Monitors above action levels, groundwater contamination under the Shadow Hills Golf Course, Low pH - acidic conditions - in Primary Impoundment Pond which are damaging to the protective liner, and much more.
Over 40 geese and ducks were killed by a 4,500 gallon solvent spill in 2005, resulting in a 2008 maximum Federal fine and restitution of $30,000. Click to read news article. An ore truck traveling from Cotter uranium mines to the Mill wrecked along the Arkansas River on Hwy 50, and leakage of the tailings impoundment was found.
No wonder ……..
Cotter went on Stand Down in March 2006
In spite of dismal Yellowcake market prices, other U.S. uranium mill projects put on hold, the economy discouraging investments, and climate problems causing drought in the region (a new mill could use 1.3 million gallons of Canon City treated water per day), Cotter intends to hold this areas economic future hostage, while they shuffle paper back and forth with the Colorado Dept. of Public Health and Environment before they will or will not begin construction in 2014. Who will invest in our community—who will retire in this ideal location—with the threat of 25-years of railroad cars bringing uranium ore past homes and businesses, and continued air, water and soil contamination looming over everyone’s heads? Click to read Cotter’s Letter of Intent to CDPHE. |
|
|
|
Judge Upholds Ban on Maywood Waste—2007 Cotter Abandons Appeals—2008
Citizens in Fremont County continued a six-year battle to keep New Jersey’s Maywood Superfund waste from being dumped in their community.
Cotter Corporation filed a District Court case hoping to overturn the final 2007 decision that prohibits Maywood Chemical Works Superfund Site (New Jersey) waste acceptance and disposal into their impoundment. A District Court Hearing heard Cotter's Complaint on Friday, November 16, 2007, at 1:30pm, Courtroom 1, 1437 Bannock St., Denver, CO. On November 30th, District Court Judge Habas issued an Order upholding the health department's decision to deny direct disposal of radioactive waste at the Cotter Uranium Mill. Click to read article.
“Maywood will continue to be a threat, until the Cotter Corporation has exhausted the legal recourses they want to pursue” said Jeri Fry, a CCAT founding Director. “Yes, I know most people don't know this and that by itself puts Fremont County back at risk. This has been a real David and Goliath battle. If the community looks away then the waste will come, and it will come from everywhere.”
In early 2008, Cotter announced abandoning the project
|
|
Click here to view documents and information: CDPHE Cotter Uranium Mill web site |
|
Cotter Uranium Mill on Stand Down since Spring 2006
Operations will not resume until the mill has been refurbished and passes a Readiness Review at CDPHE
CDPHE approved Cotter's License in early 2007
To view Cotter's latest license click here
Cotter requested an Adjudicatory Hearing on the license because they objected to some of the conditions and lack of approval to import waste for direct disposal. The Hearing was held in September of 2005. CCAT was a party requesting denial for both direct disposal of radioactive waste and processing of radioactive waste called "alternate feed." The new license did not approve importation of radioactive waste for direct disposal due to concerns about the socioeconomic effect on our community, and due to a need to investigate whether there is leakage from the impoundment's liner. Unfortunately, CDPHE did approve processing of alternate feed on a case-by-case basis. |
|
Last Update: September 2010 |
|
All proceeds from donations go to cover expenses for legal support, independent science consultants, educational materials and programs for the public, this website, and for representing our community at Hearings as done for the Maywood waste and Cotter's License. CCAT Directors and volunteers are not paid.
|


|
Click to read |
|
Click to read |
|
House Bill 10-1348 Passes Uranium Processing Accountability Act Signed by Governor Ritter June 8, 2010
Sponsors: Rep. Buffie McFadyen (D-Pueblo West), Sen. Ken Kester (R-Las Animas)
Why we needed the bill Colorado cities and rural communities depend on clean air and water and economic opportunity to provide a strong quality of life. Unfortunately, uranium processing operations in Colorado alone have cost taxpayers $1 billion, weakened economic investment opportunities, polluted precious water resources, harmed the health of Coloradans, and killed wildlife. HB 1348 holds the uranium industry accountable for its mistakes and ensures that Colorado does not incentivize pollution by saying actions have no consequences.
About the Uranium Processing Accountability Act
· Ensures that uranium operators take action and clean-up existing problems before they can apply to increase or expand onsite activities. · Protects taxpayers by allowing local government, stakeholders, and the public to submit written comments as part of CDPHE’s annual review of financial assurance for clean-up. · Protects Colorado homeowners by requiring uranium companies to notify residents with registered water wells in close proximity to known groundwater contamination. · Helps prevent communities from becoming dumping grounds for out-of-state toxic waste under the guise of uranium processing by requiring strict license provisions when seeking to accept “alternate feed,” toxic waste from industry.
The one billion dollar taxpayer bailout Clean-up of Colorado uranium mills has cost taxpayers more than $950 million dollars according to U.S. Department of Energy statistics. Spending for clean-up is ongoing, and the U.S. DOE will monitor and manage these legacy sites in perpetuity.
Cotter’s track record · The U.S. EPA has listed Cotter as a Superfund site for 25 years – the national priorities list of hazardous waste sites targeted for clean-up. Cotter was cited for 99 violations in the last 10 years. · Cotter has polluted more than a billion gallons of scarce groundwater, enough to cover more than 4,000 football fields with a foot of water or provide water to more than 8,000 households in one year. · Cotter proposed $23 million in clean-up and decommissioning bonds which could leave taxpayers on the hook given that past clean-up costs in Colorado have ranged from $50 million to $500 million. · In 2008, Cotter pleaded guilty to a federal crime of killing 40 migratory birds from a single onsite spill and received a fine and restitution totaling $30,000. |
|
Citizens Group Files Complaint to Protect Taxpayers, Provide Public Participation, and Ensure Adequate Cleanup Funds at Colorado Uranium Mill
On September 19, 2010, a Complaint was filed in District Court by CCAT against state radiation regulators which alleged their failure to follow legally-mandated procedures to set required financial assurances for cleanup at the Cotter Corporation, Cañon City, uranium mill.
Financial assurance instruments (or bonds) are necessary to ensure the State will have enough funds to decontaminate and dispose of radioactive materials in the event that the company is unable or unwilling to clean up millions of tons of waste and the pollution created by uranium milling. Click to Read Complaint |
C.C.A.T. |
Colorado Citizens Against ToxicWaste, Inc. a 501(c)3 non-profit corporation"Excellence In Community Involvement" - USEPA 2004 "Outstanding Community Service" - Sierra Club 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHARLES G. PATTERSON, Ph.D. (Click on link to read final report - Caution: Large File 20MB) |
ARJUN MAKHIJANI, Ph.D. (Click on link to read final report) |
|
Impoundment Pond Leak Investigation
CDPHE requested two studies concerning the condition of the tailings impoundments, and the USEPA also requested an evaluation. All three reports confirm and document concerns citizens have voiced for years about the installation of the impoundments in 1978-79.
1. The Bruskin report: "Due to the documented condition of the Hypalon liner at the time of installation, my opinion is that the Hypalon liner should take no credit as a physical barrier for protection against liquid migration into the material below." 2. The Sentinal report: "Numerous springs and open bedrock fractures were encountered during impoundment construction. These conditions suggest that pathways exist for migration of impoundment seepage into both shallow and deep aquifers." 3. The EPA Breeden report: "At the present time, there are insufficient ground water monitoring data to determine if a release of liquids from the Primary and Secondary Impoundments has, or has not occurred. This is due to the inadequacy of the current monitoring well network."
In 2006, Cotter installed several new wells along the edge of the impoundments, which were monitored for one year. CDPHE reviewed the sampling data and concluded that one well indicated leakage from the impoundments.
4. The CDPHE Analysis: "Based on the evidence presented, the Department determines there is evidence of a minor release of contaminated material from the Primary Impoundment as evidenced by physical and chemical evidence found in monitor well 379 as compared to surrounding wells during the evaluation period." |
|
|